بررسی روایی آزمون میدانی جدید (بتل روپ) ویژه ارزیابی توان بی‌هوازی اندام فوقانی کشتی‌گیران نخبه

عرب, حجت; آذربایجانی, محمدعلی; پیری, مقصود; سردار, محمدعلی

doi:10.22034/sbs.2019.161217

بررسی روایی آزمون میدانی جدید (بتل روپ) ویژه ارزیابی توان بی‌هوازی اندام فوقانی کشتی‌گیران نخبه

نویسندگان

حجت عرب

محمدعلی آذربایجانی

مقصود پیری

محمدعلی سردار

10.22034/sbs.2019.161217

چکیده

مقدمه و هدف: از آنجایی‌ که اندازه‌گیری توان بی‌هوازی نیازمند ابزار آزمایشگاهی دقیق بوده و امکان استفاده از این ابزار برای تمامی ورزشکاران وجود ندارد، آزمون‌های میدانی می‌تواند برای سنجش این قابلیت مورد کاربرد قرار گیرند؛ لذا هدف از این پژوهش بررسی روایی آزمون میدانی جدید ارزیابی توان بی‌هوازی (بتل روپ) کشتی‌گیران نخبه بود.
مواد و روش ها: ‌42 کشتی‌گیر نخبه خراسان رضوی به‌صورت داوطلبان در این مطالعه شرکت کردند. در دو مرحله بافاصله استراحتی یک‌هفته‌ای، آزمون وینگیت بی‌هوازی اندام فوقانی و آزمون بتل روپ اندازه‌گیری شد. قبل، بلافاصله، 5 دقیقه و 10 دقیقه پس از پایان آزمون تغییرات ضربان قلب و لاکتات خون اندازه‌گیری شد. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها از ضریب همبستگی پیرسون ،ضریب همبستگی درون کلاسی، توافق بلاندآلتمن و رگرسیون خطی استفاده شد. سطح معنی‌داری 0.05>P در نظر گرفته شده است.
یافته‌ها: بین ظرفیت بی‌هوازی آزمون وینگیت 30 ثانیه‌ای اندام فوقانی و آزمون بتل روپ رابطه مثبت معنی‌داری وجود داشت (0.66=r؛ 0.001=P ). بین توان اوج مطلق (0.97=r؛ 0.001=P ) و نسبی (0.52=r؛ 0.007=P )، توان میانگین مطلق (0.44=r؛ 0.02=P ) و توان حداقل مطلق (0.41=r؛ 0.03=P ) توان بی‎هوازی در دو روش رابطه مثبت معنی‌داری مشاهده شد. تغییرات ضربان قلب و لاکتات خون در دقیقه 5 (0.52=r؛ 0.007=P ). و 10 (0.65=r؛ 0.001=P ). رابطه مثبت و معنی‌دار را نشان داد. ضریب توافق بین کلاسی پایایی برابر با 463/0=P بود که همبستگی متوسط را نشان داد، اما نمودار بلاندآلتمن نشان داد بین میانگین و اختلاف ظرفیت بی‌هوازی در هر دو روش توافق قابلقبولی وجود دارد.
بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج این مطالعه نشان داد آزمون میدانی جدیدارزیابی توان بی‌هوازی (بتل روپ) از اعتبار لازم برای تعیین توان بی‌هوازی اندام فوقانی در کشتی‌گیران برخوردار است؛ لذا به مربیان توصیه می‌گردد برای تعیین توان بی‌هوازی کشتی‌گیران می‌توانند به‌جای آزمون وینگیت از این آزمون استفاده نمایند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

کشتی

ظرفیت بی‌هوازی

آزمون وینگیت بی‌هوازی

آزمون طراحی شده اختصاصی

عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation of the validity and reliability of the new specific field test for evaluating the upper body anaerobic capacity of elite wrestlers

نویسندگان English

Hojat Arab

mohammadali Azarbayjani

maghsood Peeri

mohammadali sardar

چکیده English

Introduction and Purpose: Anaerobic power and capacity are considered determinants of performance and are usually assessed in athletes as a part of their physical capacities’ evaluation along the season. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity a new field test for the assessment of the anaerobic capacity of elite wrestlers.
Materials and methods: 42 elite wrestlers of Khorasan Razavi participated in this study, voluntarily. In two stages with one-week rest interval, an upper-body Wingate anaerobic test and a specifically designed test were measured. Before, immediately, five and ten minutes, variations of the heart rate and blood lactate were measured. In the designed test, a battle rope was used, each participant performed alternating arm waves with a Japanese guard for 30 seconds as maximum as possible.
To analyze of data Pearson correlation coefficient, inter-class correlation coefficient , Bland-Altman agreement and linear regression were used.
Results: There was a significant relationship between the anaerobic capacity of the 30-second upper-body Wingate test and the specifically designed test. Also, a significant relationship was observed between absolute (r=0.66; P=0.001) and relative peak (r=0.52; P=0.007), absolute mean power (r=0.44; P=0.02) and absolute minimum power (r=0.41; P=0.03) in two methods. The variations in HR and BLa were statistically significant at minute 5 (r=0.52; P=0.007) and 10 (r=0.65; P=0.001), respectively. The linear regression model was able to predict the anaerobic capacity using the specifically designed test. The inter-class agreement coefficient was poor (P=0.463), but my Bland-Altman diagram showed that there was a good agreement between the mean and the difference in anaerobic capacity in both methods.
Discussion and Conclusion: Using available alternative methods with high external validity to assess upper anaerobic capacity is a more appropriate method than laboratory tests. The specifically designed test seems to able the prediction of the upper body anaerobic capacity in elite wrestlers.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

wrestling

Anaerobic capacity

Anaerobic Wingate test

Specific designed test

1.Billat, V. L., Flechet, B., Petit, B., Muriaux, G., & Koralsztein, J.-P. (1999). Interval training at VO2max: effects on aerobic performance and overtraining markers. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 31(1), 156-163. 2.Da Silva, J. F., Guglielmo, L. G., Carminatti, L. J., De Oliveira, F. R., Dittrich, N., & Paton, C. D. (2011). Validity and reliability of a new field test (Carminatti's test) for soccer players compared with laboratory-based measures. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29(15), 1621-1628. 3.Currell, K., & Jeukendrup, A. E. (2008). Validity, reliability and sensitivity of measures of sporting performance. Sports medicine, 38(4), 297-316. 4.Carminatti, L., Lima-Silva, A., & De-Oliveira, F. (2004). Aerobic fitness in intermittent sports-Evidence of construct validity and results in incremental test with pause. Rev Bras Fisiol Exerc, 3(1), 120-129. 5.Krustrup, P., Mohr, M., Amstrup, T., Rysgaard, T., Johansen, J., Steensberg, A., . . . Bangsbo, J. (2003). The yo-yo intermittent recovery test: physiological response, reliability, and validity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 35(4), 697-705. 6.Barbero-Álvarez, J., & Barbero-Álvarez, V. (2003). Relationship between oxygen consumption and the ability to perform high-intensity intermittent exercise in futsal players. Training Journal, 17(2), 401-407. 7.Čović, N., Jelešković, E., Alić, H., Rađo, I., Kafedžić, E., Sporiš, G., . . . Milanović, Z. (2016). Reliability, validity and usefulness of 30–15 intermittent fitness test in female soccer players. Frontiers in physiology, 7(3), 510-518. 8.Fatouros, I., Laparidis, K., Kambas, A., Chatzinikolaou, A., Techlikidou, E., Katrabasas, I., . . . Draganidis, D. (2011). Validity and reliability of the single-trial line drill test of anaerobic power in basketball players. Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness, 51(1), 33. 9.Attia, A., Hachana, Y., Chaabène, H., Gaddour, A., Neji, Z., Shephard, R. J., & Chelly, M. S. (2014). Reliability and validity of a 20-s alternative to the Wingate anaerobic test in team sport male athletes. PloS one, 9(12), 114-119. 10.Mendez-Villanueva, A., Edge, J., Suriano, R., Hamer, P., & Bishop, D. (2012). The recovery of repeated-sprint exercise is associated with PCr resynthesis, while muscle pH and EMG amplitude remain depressed. PloS one, 7(12), 519-527. 11.Bertuzzi, R., Kiss, M., Damasceno, M., Oliveira, R., & Lima-Silva, A. (2015). Association between anaerobic components of the maximal accumulated oxygen deficit and 30-second Wingate test. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 48(3), 261-266. 12.Dimarucot, H. C., & Macapagal, L. S. (2021). The Validity and Reliability of Three Field Tests for Assessing College Freshmen Students' Cardiovascular Endurance. 13.Hachana, Y., Attia, A., Nassib, S., Shephard, R. J., & Chelly, M. S. (2012). Test-retest reliability, criterion-related validity, and minimal detectable change of score on an abbreviated Wingate test for field sport participants. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 26(5), 1324-1330. 14.McLellan, T. M., & Jacobs, I. (1993). Reliability, reproducibility and validity of the individual anaerobic threshold. European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 67(2), 125-131. 15.Tayech, A., Mejri, M. A., Chaabene, H., Chaouachi, M., Behm, D. G., & Chaouachi, A. (2018). Test-retest reliability and criterion validity of a new Taekwondo Anaerobic Intermittent Kick Test. The journal of sports medicine and physical fitness, 59(2), 230-237. 16.Beneke, R., Pollmann, C., Bleif, I., Leithäuser, R., & Hütler, M. (2002). How anaerobic is the Wingate Anaerobic Test for humans? European journal of applied physiology, 87(4), 388-392. 17.Wilson, R. W., Snyder, A. C., & Dorman, J. C. (2009). Analysis of seated and standing triple Wingate tests. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 23(3), 868-873. 18.Granier, P., Mercier, B., Mercier, J., Anselme, F., & Prefaut, C. (1995). Aerobic and anaerobic contribution to Wingate test performance in sprint and middle-distance runners. European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 70(1), 58-65. 19.Meckel, Y., Atterbom, H., Grodjinovsky, A., Ben-Sira, D., & Rotstein, A. (1995). Physiological characteristics of female 100 metre sprinters of different performance levels. The journal of sports medicine and physical fitness, 35(3), 169-175. 20.Perez-Gomez, J., Rodriguez, G. V., Ara, I., Olmedillas, H., Chavarren, J., González-Henriquez, J. J., . . . Calbet, J. A. (2008). Role of muscle mass on sprint performance: gender differences? European journal of applied physiology, 102(6), 685-694. 21.Tharp, G. D., Newhouse, R. K., Uffelman, L., Thorland, W. G., & Johnson, G. O. (1985). Comparison of sprint and run times with performance on the Wingate anaerobic test. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 6(1), 73-77. 22.Zagatto, A. M., Beck, W. R., & Gobatto, C. A. (2009). Validity of the running anaerobic sprint test for assessing anaerobic power and predicting short-distance performances. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 23(6), 1820-1827. 23.Cooper, S., Baker, J., Eaton, Z., & Matthews, N. (2004). A simple multistage field test for the prediction of anaerobic capacity in female games players. British journal of sports medicine, 38(6), 784-789. 24.Čular, D., Ivančev, V., Zagatto, A. M., Milić, M., Beslija, T., Sellami, M., & Padulo, J. (2018). Validity and reliability of the 30-s continuous jump for anaerobic power and capacity assessment in combat sport. Frontiers in physiology, 9(5), 43-49. 25.Queiroga, M. R., Cavazzotto, T. G., Katayama, K. Y., Portela, B. S., Tartaruga, M. P., & Ferreira, S. A. (2013). Validity of the RAST for evaluating anaerobic power performance as compared to Wingate test in cycling athletes. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física, 19(4), 696-702. 26.Marković1ABCDE, M., Dopsaj1ABCDE, M., Kasum1ADE, G., Zarić1AB, I., & Toskić2AB, L. (2017). Reliability of the two new specific wrestling tests: performance, metabolic and cardiac indicators. science of martial arts, 13(1), 100-117. 27.Mirzaei, B., Faryabi, I., & Yousefabadi, H. A. (2021). Time-Motion analysis of the 2017 Wrestling World Championships. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports, 25(1), 24-30. [Persian] 28.Mirzaei, B., Ghahremani Moghaddam, M., & Alizaee Yousef Abadi, H. (2017). Analysis of energy systems in greco-roman and freestyle wrestlers who participated in the 2015 and 2016 world championships. International Journal of Wrestling Science, 7(1-2), 35-40. 29.Barbas, I., Fatouros, I. G., Douroudos, I. I., Chatzinikolaou, A., Michailidis, Y., Draganidis, D., . . . Theodorou, A. A. (2011). Physiological and performance adaptations of elite Greco-Roman wrestlers during a one-day tournament. European journal of applied physiology, 1(7)1421-1436. 30.Rezaei, R. (2013). Designing a specific upper body anaerobic power test for wrestling. Research in Sport Medicine and Technology, 3(6), 1-14. [Persian] 31.Harvey, L., Bousson, M., McLellan, C., & Lovell, D. (2017). The effect of previous wingate performance using one body region on subsequent wingate performance using a different body region. Journal of human kinetics, 56(1), 119-126. 32.Ponce-García, T., Benítez-Porres, J., García-Romero, J. C., Castillo-Domínguez, A., & Alvero-Cruz, J. R. (2021). The Anaerobic Power Assessment in CrossFit® Athletes: An Agreement Study. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(16), 8878. 33.Demirkan, E., Kutlu, M., Koz, M., Özal, M., & Favre, M. (2014). Physical fitness differences between freestyle and Greco-Roman junior wrestlers. Journal of human kinetics, 41(1), 245-251.